A Consultant's Tale of CHAOS Part III - Chapter Two: Testing, Testing
Issue # 307 - November 21, 2003

VirtualBEACON™ Index

Welcome to Issue #307 of The Standish Group's VirtualBEACON™

STAT-BIT

In our October DARTS we asked respondents, “What return on investment do you think you might obtain by using a quality/testing/inspection tool?” The results were:

Under 10%: 25%
10% to 25%: 43%
26% to 50%: 20%
Over 50%: 11%

If you were among those who submitted questions last month make sure to stop by and get your answers! If you have questions, monthly DARTS can provide the answers.

EDITORIAL

A Consultant's Tale of CHAOS Part III - Chapter Two: Testing, Testing

The test plan is a series of controlled events defining the description of each event, the step by step processes, input data, expected results, actual results and if the condition passed or failed. It is the measurement to insure that the custom-mod fulfills the Functional Requirements, which have not yet been written. I started to be concerned on page 2 (page 1 was the header) when the test data was defined as TBD (to be determined), the expected results and actual results were identical, including misspelled words, and all results were “passed.” I remembered that all these custom-mods were developed “off-shore” and thought to myself, “WOW, these people must have test tools far and away better than anything I had ever seen or used; without even defining input data they get the expected results and pass all tests.” Even the expected results and actual results are identical right down to the same spelling errors. I wondered if this testing software was commercially available outside their home countries or planets and maybe I could get the local franchise. Some of the process steps even instructed the tester to press buttons that were not even visible on the screen and certainly did not exist on the keyboard but must be somewhere because the test passed. Was the goal of Artificial Intelligence finally to be realized?

I laid out the technical specifications, individual test conditions, and corresponding screen shots to insure they were consistent and accurate. I must admit once again, beginning on page 2, I did encounter some problems. Field names on the technical specification did not match either the test plan or the screen shot, tests to display data produced blank results, and the data in the two sets of current year/prior year fields were exactly identical. Maybe it wasn’t a typo? I felt a more in-depth review of the actual code was warranted to get to the bottom of these issues. I still had visions of becoming the sole franchise owner in North America of this wonderful testing software.

The review of the source code unfortunately aligned pretty closely with the screen shot (surprise) and not the test plan or the technical specifications. The same 2 data elements were being used to populate 4 fields on the screen. The customer category field had been replaced with material pricing. Nothing was being moved into the customer contract number and a 10-position date field was being manipulated and squished into a 4-position date field that went nowhere. I was starting to lose interest in the franchise, as I felt this stuff was way beyond me and that I did not possess the required skills needed to successfully use the product. I decided to let my immediate supervisor in on all I had learned and, if it made sense to him, perhaps I could still get the franchise and we could go in on it 50/50. Unfortunately, the prospects did not look good!

I said very little as I laid out the various documents for the two of us to review together. I didn’t want to sway his judgment and observations in any way and felt I had probably overlooked big chunks (still thinking of that duct tape) of good stuff, somewhere in the data I reviewed. Our review was peppered by comments such as, “What the heck is this?” “That’s crap!” “That makes no sense” and others not fit for a family publication. He asked if the Business Process Owner was aware of this and I stated I didn’t know, but I certainly had not contacted that person.

Stay tuned for our next issue and meet Mr. Tanni…

ANNOUNCEMENTS

New ROI Calculator!

The first release of the VirtualADVISOR Return on Investment (ROI) Calculator is now available in the tool section of our website. The ROI Calculator is used to compute return for any type of project and situation. The calculator allows you to enter four item categories: capital, cost, savings, and revenue. These items are used to compute ROI and payback period.

Currently this is a standalone application. We plan to integrate the ROI Calculator into the Cost Estimator, Risk Estimator, as well as our project and asset management tools. For instructions on using the calculator please see below. Later, these instructions will be displayed in a ‘help’ section. The help section is displayed once the ROI Calculator icon is ‘clicked’.

We are collecting requirements for the second release. If you wish to share suggestions, comments, or experience problems using the tool please submit an email to feedback@standishgroup.com.

General Instructions to use the ROI Calculator (login to the VirtualADVISOR system is required):

Step #1: Click on “Create a case”.

Step #2: Fill in the case name field and years for ROI Calculation. Type in any name you wish and the number of years you want included in the calculation. Click “Submit”.

Step #3: A new form will display four fields:
1) Number of capitalized items
2) Number of cost items
3) Number of savings items
4) Number of revenue items

Type in the number of items for each of these categories and click “Submit”. Note: a value must be entered into each field, even if it is zero.

Step #4: This step includes the first year’s detail with 3 major fields: Name of item, quantity and cost. The one exception is for the capitalized items that will be carried forward into subsequent years. You can also make changes in those years. Capitalized items will be included with additional input as instructed on the form. One you have filled in the form click “submit”.

Note: On far right of the form is a field entitled “Sub-Items”. This allows you to have a number of items roll-up to a single item, such as on first page you might have “Staff”. On the sub-items you can break this down into titles.

Repeat step #4 for each year. After all the years are done the system will generate a report.

You can also create templates by first creating a case and saving it as a template.


We hope you enjoyed this week's VirtualBEACON™. If you would like to be removed from this e-mail list at any time, please respond with the word "Remove" in the subject heading. As always, if you have any questions or comments, contact beacon@standishgroup.com.

Copyright 2002

This VirtualBEACON™ is protected by copyright and is the sole property of The Standish Group International, Incorporated. It is intended solely for the private use of the subscribing company and may not under any circumstances be re-transmitted in any form, repackaged in any way or resold through any media.

PLEASE RESPECT INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS!

VirtualBEACON™ Index

 

CLASS Finalists | Keynotes & Discussions | Workshops
Photo Album | Prior Attendees | Testimonials
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

All contents are COPYRIGHT © 2008 by The Standish Group International, Inc. All rights reserved.